SB 180 self-expiration — all four cities enter adoption windows

Correction (June 4, 2026): this watch was wrong, and we are leaving it published. SB 180 does not self-expire in June 2026. Per Chapter 2025-190 §28, the statute expires June 30, 2028, and its "more restrictive or burdensome" moratorium runs through October 1, 2027 (retroactive to August 1, 2024). The June 2026 date came from SB 840, a 2026 fix bill that passed the Senate unanimously but died in the House Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee on March 13, 2026. The corpus inferred the opposite of the truth from "all bills failed" — because the bill that failed was the one that would have created a June 2026 sunset. We publish the misread rather than quietly delete it; the corrected successor is SB 180 — the real sunset, June 2028. The text below is preserved as authored on May 7, 2026, for the record.

---

What's pending

SB 180 sunsets on its own terms in June 2026. The statute's "more restrictive or burdensome" trigger ceases to apply to new code adoptions after that date. Codes adopted between August 2024 and June 2026 remain protected by the grandfather window; codes attempted under the freeze (modifications, amendments, new ordinances tightening any standard) regain enforceability when the sunset lands.

The Senate repeal effort failed earlier in 2026 — Anita Geraci-Carver, departing City Attorney for Groveland, named it explicitly on the record at her last meeting (April 2): "All bills failed. Comprehensive Plan Amendment is currently under state of emergency for the three hurricanes therefore changes cannot be made at this time. Bill 180 expires June 2026."

The four-city adoption race

Each south-Lake city enters the post-sunset window with a different regulatory posture:

• Clermont — DPZ CoDesign-authored downtown form-based code in active drafting; comp plan update underway; the strongest defensive architecture in the corpus
• Groveland — CDC V5 (form-based code) still being drafted under freeze; institutional capacity hollowing (three interim department heads + outgoing City Attorney); the most exposed city in the corpus
• Leesburg — no defensive code architecture authored under the freeze; the denial bloc's filtering is currently the only protective mechanism, structurally vulnerable to litigation post-sunset
• Minneola — environmental conditions discipline ("Shape, don't deny") has been embedded in stipulations; the formal code update is pending

Watch which city brings the first post-sunset code adoption to a vote. The first mover sets the regional precedent for what's permissible under the new regime.

What to look for

• A formal code adoption vote in any of the four cities within 30 days of sunset
• Litigation filed under SB 180's "more restrictive or burdensome" standard against any code adopted in the August 2024 – June 2026 window
• The hurricane state-of-emergency declaration status (the freeze on comprehensive plan amendments is layered on top of SB 180; if the SOE persists, CPA-level changes remain blocked even after SB 180 sunsets)

Resolution criteria

This watch item resolves when:

• SB 180 formally sunsets (June 2026), AND
• At least one of the four cities authors and adopts a substantive code change citing the lift

The outcome assessment will name which city moved first, what they adopted, and whether the regulatory architecture matched the protective posture each city had been authoring under the freeze.

Source trail

• April 2, 2026 Groveland P&Z meeting (Anita's last)
• The Grandfather Window — brief
• The Quiet Revolution on Highway 27 — brief