Get the Weekly Signal
Project / Case · 17.878-acre commercial PUD at the Citrus Grove Road / N. Hancock corridor formation, Minneola

Citrus Ridge Commercial PUD

Citrus Ridge Commercial PUD is a three-ordinance entitlement package (Ordinance 2026-02 annexation/rezoning, Ordinance 2026-03 comp plan amendment to General Commercial, Resolution 2026-01 development agreement) for two parcels west of N. Hancock Road, north and south of Citrus Grove Road, in Minneola. The applicant is Crittenden Howey, LLC, represented by Tara L. Tedrow, Esq. of Lowndes Drosdick. The case was originally filed as "Citrus Grove Road Commercial PUD" at 15.878± acres; on the May 4, 2026 agenda it returned as "Citrus Ridge Commercial PUD" at 17.878± acres — a rename event distancing the new commercial PUD from the existing Citrus Grove residential PUD on the same road, and a 2-acre upward revision. The April 6 P&Z meeting tabled all three items on a Rose-McCoy motion (4-0, applicant-requested), preventing any substantive hearing — the first procedural delay positioned by the same two-commissioner pair that dissented on Whispering Winds March 2.

Class
Project / Case
First named
2026-04-06
Last active
2026-05-04
Status
active
Case
Ordinance 2026-02 / 2026-03 / Resolution 2026-01

The case file

Three instruments comprise the Citrus Ridge entitlement package:

  • Ordinance 2026-02 — annexation of ~17.878± acres into the City and rezoning of Lake County "Agriculture" → "Planned Unit Development"
  • Ordinance 2026-03 — Future Land Use Map amendment to General Commercial
  • Resolution 2026-01 — development agreement

Two parcels generally located west of N. Hancock Road, north and south of Citrus Grove Road. The applicant is Crittenden Howey, LLC; legal representation is Tara L. Tedrow, Esq. of Lowndes Drosdick.

The rename and the revision

The April 6, 2026 meeting filing was titled "Citrus Grove Road Commercial PUD" at 15.878± acres. The May 4, 2026 agenda re-listed the package as "Citrus Ridge Commercial PUD" at 17.878± acres. The rename and the 2-acre upward revision happened in the 28-day window between the tabling motion and the substantive return. Two distinct effects:

  • Naming distance — the existing Citrus Grove residential PUD sits on the same road; the rename separates the new commercial PUD from that prior project.
  • Acreage growth — 2 acres added (mechanism not stated in the corpus); the case grows during the delay rather than shrinking.

The procedural delay

At the April 6, 2026 P&Z meeting, Commissioner Rose moved to table all three items, Commissioner McCoy seconded. The motion carried 4-0 (Martin, Calderon, McCoy, Rose AYE). The applicant requested the tabling, so the procedural posture is clean — but Rose-McCoy are the same pair that dissented on the Whispering Winds environmental conditions package on March 2, 2026, when the case turned 3-2 (the first 3-2 split in recent Minneola P&Z). Two consecutive meetings of the same procedural-and-substantive faction positioning at the gate of the corridor's biggest commercial play.

The corridor formation

Three projects now cluster at the Citrus Grove Road / N. Hancock corner:

  • The existing Citrus Grove residential PUD (south side)
  • Citrus Ridge Commercial PUD (~17.878 acres, this entity)
  • Camp Lake Industrial Park (preliminary subdivision plat, north of Citrus Grove, west of N. Hancock)

A residential PUD next to a commercial PUD next to an industrial subdivision plat, all at the same intersection. This is a corridor formation event — the eastern Minneola gateway off the Turnpike-fed Hancock alignment converting from rural-residential to mixed commercial-industrial in real time. The Crittenden Howey + Tara Tedrow / Lowndes representation is the same combination visible in Crystal Cove and other Lake County corridor casework — the legal-representation network is itself a forward indicator of where the next applications will land.

What the May 4 vote tested

The May 4, 2026 meeting was the first substantive hearing after the April 6 tabling. The watch dossier citrus-ridge-substantive-vote-may-4 tracks the outcome — whether the Rose-McCoy bloc cohered or fractured on substance, and how the Commission treated the rename, the acreage revision, and the corridor-formation framing in open hearing.

Where this entity appears

Bidirectional links across the corpus

Provenance trail