Get the Weekly Signal
CHANGE LENS

THE READINGmeeting record

City of Groveland Planning & Zoning Board — August 7, 2025

Meeting Overview

Type: Regular Meeting Quorum: Yes (6 of 8 members present) Duration: Approximately 59 minutes (5:03 PM - 6:02 PM)

Attendance

  • Present: Zach Decker (Chair), Robin Hoover (Vice Chair), Kerry Lambert, Alisha Kissee-Garcia, Lindsay Crum, Mike Archer
  • Absent: Stephen Shylkofski, Bill Mathias
  • Staff Present: City Attorney Anita Geraci-Carver; Timothy Maslow, Community & Economic Development Department Director; DeWayne Jones, Planning and Zoning Manager; Alan Booker, Senior Planner; Maria Ramirez, Recording Secretary

Agenda Items

Item 0: Consent Agenda — Approval of July 16, 2025 Minutes

  • Type: Consent
  • Action: Approved
  • Vote: Unanimous (6-0)

Item 1: Ordinance 2025-20 — Cherry Lake Village PUD Amendment

  • Type: PUD Amendment
  • Case Number: Ordinance 2025-20
  • Location: Cherry Lake Trail and Wilson Lake Parkway, Groveland
  • Applicant: Orsi Development Inc. and Sunfield Homes, Inc. (represented by Carolyn Haslam, Ackerman)
  • Request: Amend PUD (Ordinances 2002-0732B and 2017-12-38) for Estates at Cherry Lake — modify the Village Center development plan to reduce commercial space and add denser residential with 35-foot lots
  • Proposed Commercial: Minimum 10,000 sq. ft. (reduced from original plan); up to 1 acre including parking
  • Proposed Residential: 35-foot wide lots, homes 1,200-2,400 sq. ft.
  • Acreage: Approximately 30 acres total PUD (amendment applies to remaining undeveloped Village Center portion)
  • Action: Denied (recommendation to City Council)
  • Vote: Unanimous (6-0) to deny
  • Notable Discussion:
    • Resident William Rutter (Crest Ridge/Estates at Cherry Lake) testified that residents bought in expecting commercial development, want to keep it, and do not need more houses — commercial would keep traffic local for pedestrians and bikes
    • Vice Chair Hoover asked about the scale of 10,000 sq. ft. commercial (comparable to a Walgreens; would support 4-5 smaller shops); questioned parking adequacy within 1 acre; asked about access points near the school
    • Board Member Crum expressed strong concerns about 35-foot lots being too small, stating 60-foot lots already feel cramped; questioned walkability of the proposed layout, predicting residents would just drive rather than walk
    • Board Member Archer raised first responder access concerns; applicant stated on-street parking would be in dedicated stalls and roadway width meets fire truck requirements
    • Board Member Lambert recommended a financial impact comparison and surveying Cherry Lake residents before deciding
    • Board Member Kissee-Garcia confirmed the existing PUD still governs if the amendment is denied
    • Chairman Decker noted the existing PUD requires residential to be built above non-residential use

Public Hearings Summary

  • Number of speakers: 1
  • General sentiment: Opposed to amendment
  • Key concerns:
    • Residents purchased homes expecting commercial amenities in the Village Center and want that commercial zoning preserved
    • Concern that more residential density does not serve the community's needs
    • Desire for walkable, local commercial services to reduce car trips

Key Signals

  • Board unanimously rejects reducing commercial for denser residential: The Cherry Lake Village PUD amendment denial is a strong signal that Groveland's P&Z Board values preserving planned commercial space over allowing developers to convert it to higher-density residential. This aligns with a broader Central Florida pattern where residents push back against losing promised commercial amenities.
  • 35-foot lots face resistance in Groveland: Board Member Crum's pushback on 35-foot wide lots — calling existing 60-foot lots "cramped" — sets a baseline for minimum lot size expectations. This is relevant for any future residential proposals in Groveland.
  • SB 180 constraining local code changes until October 2027: Staff flagged that state bill SB 180 limits the city from adopting stricter development codes until at least October 2027. This is a significant constraint on Groveland's ability to raise standards during a period of rapid growth and comprehensive plan revision.
  • September P&Z meeting rescheduled to September 22: The regular September 4 meeting was moved due to a staff conference in Tampa, where staff planned to research optimal commercial-to-residential ratios — directly relevant to the Cherry Lake Village denial.
  • Resident engagement driving board decisions: William Rutter's testimony about buying into Cherry Lake expecting commercial amenities carried visible weight in the board's deliberations. Community input is actively shaping land use outcomes in Groveland, not just providing commentary.

Raw Notes

  • Vice Chair Hoover noted that Lake 100's September meeting will focus on planning and zoning.
  • Alan Booker stated staff will explore optimal commercial-to-residential ratios at a Tampa conference.
  • The consent agenda references approving "June 5, 2025 minutes" but the agenda item title says "July 16, 2025" — appears to be a scrivener's error in the motion language of the official record.
  • Tim Maslow emphasized the importance of residents showing up to provide feedback.