The approve-pole that lost its second
Sanders' most consequential moment in the corpus is procedural: his January 22, 2026 motion to APPROVE Cronin-Dewey Robbins SSCP-25-813 died for lack of a second. A Vice-Chair making an APPROVE motion that finds no second on a staff-recommended case is unusual in this corpus. The signal was not that Sanders' substantive position lost — it was that the Bowersox-led bloc declined to provide procedural courtesy. Bowersox immediately moved to DENY; Simeone seconded; the case rolled to 4-2 disapproval.
The Sennett-Sanders pole
Across the contested cases of late 2025 and early 2026, Sanders pairs with Chair Sennett as the structural approve-with-conditions pole. They voted NO on the deny motions for Banning 5 (October 23, 2025), both Dominium Apartments cases (November 20, 2025), both Lake Bright-Brighurst cases (January 22, 2026 — 3-3 ties carrying disapproval), and both Cronin-Dewey Robbins cases. The pole follows staff recommendations more reliably than the bloc opposite it. The pole does not carry a majority on rural-arterial high-density entitlements.
Where the pole holds
Sanders is part of the unanimous bench on adaptive reuse, downtown infill, and small-scale residential cases. He voted YES 6-0 on both March 19, 2026 R-2 elder-care CUPs (Mispah Street ALF, Butler Street CRR), YES on Lake Margaretta Phase 2 in December 2025 (75 SF lots, 25-acre infill), and YES on Royal Highland in August 2025 — though the Royal Highland approve-motion failed when Carter, Kaplan, and Simeone formed the no-second pole that previewed the 2026 dynamic.